Impoliteness in Online Reactions to Media Reports of the 2019 Nigerian Presidential Election
- Chidi Nwankwo1
- Kenneth Ahaiwe1
- Chuka Ononye2
- 1Department of English & Literary Studies, University of Nigeria
- 2Department of English and Literary Studies, University of Nigeria, Nsukka
- Published in
- Volume 21, Issue 2 (September 2021), pp. 142–168
- Published
Abstract
Online political discourse following high-stakes presidential elections in deeply polarised post-colonial democracies often degenerates into hyper-partisanship and severe incivility, yet the underlying socio-cognitive and sociolinguistic mechanisms driving these aggressive digital linguistic attacks remain under-scrutinised. Addressing this gap, this study empirically investigates the pragmatic features and socio-political functions of impoliteness in online user comments responding to media reports declaring the winner of the 2019 Nigerian presidential election on Sahara Reporters. Adopting a qualitative socio-cognitive approach grounded in Jonathan Culpeper’s (2011) pragmatic impoliteness framework, a working corpus of 180 comments organised into 25 interactional frames was purposively sampled and systematically analysed through frame-based discourse modelling. Findings reveal that insults specifically personalised negative references, third-person negative references, and negative vocatives dominated the dataset. These were strategically combined with unpalatable questions, presuppositions, condescension, silencers, and indirect threats, operating primarily through both coercive and affective impoliteness, alongside entertaining impoliteness deployed for majoritarian triumphalism. Crucially, the study’s primary contribution to knowledge demonstrates that impoliteness in computer-mediated political discourse extends far beyond routine conversational friction or interpersonal incivility. Rather, it functions as a strategic vehicle for weaponised historical memory, ethno-regional identity construction, institutional delegitimisation, and the socio-cognitive pathologisation of political dissent. Ultimately, the paper illuminates how digital comment sections serve as volatile, contested socio-political arenas where majoritarian hegemonies, ethno-political affiliations, and democratic legitimacy are continuously negotiated, enforced, and resisted.
Read the full article
Download PDFLoading…
The PDF opens here.
More from this issue
- Non-Human Agency and Ecological Resistance in Maaza Mengiste’s The Shadow King
Vivien Bello-Osagie
- Archetype and the Image of the Woman in Amu-Nnadi’s A Field of Echoes
Chinasa Abonyi, Chidi Eze and Chinonye Okemuo
- Non-Human Agency and Ecological Resistance in Maaza Mengiste’s The Shadow King
Vivien Bello-Osagie
- Archetype and the Image of the Woman in Amu-Nnadi’s A Field of Echoes
Chinasa Abonyi, Chidi Eze and Chinonye Okemuo
- Literary Analysis of the Performance and Song Texts of Mgboka Umuanunu, Ngwa Women’s Wing, Ilishan, Ogun State.
Okpala, Victory Ogochukwu
More in Linguistic Analysis and Discourse Studies
- Pre-Election Construction of Public Trust and Electoral Legitimacy in Nigeria’s 2027 Presidential Election Discourse
Godwin Chibueze Didigwu, Matthew Chinenye NNuta and Bernice Nonye Ogbochie
- The Use of Lamentation as Discursive Construction of Insecurity and Economic Crises in Opposition Manifestoes in Nigeria
Arilesere R. Mustapha and Funke J. Oni
- Discursive Representation of Social Actors in the 2025 Federal High Court Ruling on
Emmanuel Ogbonna Okoro
- Discursive Lexicalisation in Election Petition Tribunals in Nigeria
Anthony Elisha Anowu and Tunde Ope-Davies
- Pragmatic Acts Analysis of Donald Trump’s “Save America” Speech
Amaka G. Nwuche, Kelvin S. Onyeagwaram and and Ogechi C. Unachukwu